Challenge by Berlin Science Week
How can science help bridge divides?
Welcome to this Futures Canvas challenge
Let’s explore future possibilities, together
How to participate
1
About
Learn about this challenge
2
Submit
Submit your opinion
3
Rate
Rate opinions from others
4
Results
View survey results and scenarios
Take part in the interactive future survey. Share your opinion and rate the opinions of others.
Learn about this challenge
1
More about the challenge topic, goal and organiser
In an era marked by growing polarization and misinformation, science finds itself in a dual role: both a target of increased skepticism and a potential force for unity. Although public confidence remains relatively strong, recent studies reveal increasing instances of hostility toward science, highlighting the need for new ways to foster trust and connection across divides.
Recent findings indicate that while a majority of people in Germany still trust in science (Wissenschaftsbarometer 2023), there are alarming signs of growing rejection and even hostility. Nearly half of scientists surveyed in a representative study (DZHW 2024) report experiencing at least one form of anti-scientific hostility, with 10% facing severe threats. These tensions underscore the need for science not only to share knowledge but also to foster trust, empathy, and inclusive dialogue.
Under this year’s annual theme, "Common Ground," this challenge invites participants of Berlin Science Week to imagine ways science can better contribute to social cohesion and resilience, equipping individuals with tools to navigate a rapidly changing world. Could we rethink how complex facts are communicated? How might science better inform decision-making? And could embracing diverse perspectives in research help science foster greater understanding across society?
Why Participate?
The results of this survey will be evaluated in collaboration with ASU Decision Theater and will be published through Berlin Science Week.
Who can Participate?
This challenge is open to all participants of Berlin Science Week 2024.
How might science better inform decision-making to tackle complex challenges?
How might science enable greater diversity in research to enrich our understanding?
How might science better communicate facts on difficult topics?
How might science empower individuals to navigate an ever-changing world?
Further Reading
Wissenschaftsbarometer 2023 – Repräsentative Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Wissenschaft und Forschung DZHW 2024 – Blümel, Clemens. 2024: Anfeindungen gegen Forschende: Eine repräsentative Studie des Projektes KAPAZ. Kurzdossier über die Berichterstattung. Hrsg: Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung GmbH.Challenge Hosts
Berlin Science Week
Berlin Science Week is an international gathering that brings together leading scientific organizations and innovators to share insights and explore the impact of science on society.
Decision Theatre
Decision Theatre is a collaborative platform that uses data visualization and interactive environments to support decision-making and engage diverse stakeholders in complex problem-solving.
Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung
The Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung conducts cutting-edge research in the fields of human development, education, and societal change, aiming to advance scientific understanding of cognitive and social processes.
Arizona State University
Arizona State University is a leading public research institution known for its innovative approach to education, commitment to inclusivity, and impactful research across a wide range of disciplines.
Challenge Context
This challenge is organized in the context of Berlin Science Week 2024 by Falling Walls Foundation, and organized in collaboration with Decision Theatre, Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, and Arizona State University.
Now, it's your turn!
Submit your opinion
2
What are your thoughts on the challenge question?
Share your future expectations, hopes and fears by submitting them via the form. After a brief review, they will be published on this page and can be rated by others. All rated opinions are used to create future scenarios in real time with the help of AI.
Challenge by Berlin Science Week
How can science help bridge divides?
What do you think about the opinions submitted by others?
Rate opinions from others
3
With your ratings, you help to create meaningful future scenarios.
Feel free to rate as many as you'd like using the sliders, and don't forget to submit your vote.
Challenge by Berlin Science Week
How can science help bridge divides?
Science is about exploring possible futures and finding solutions to problems caused by inflexibility and looking backward. It provides fact-based hope and encourages people to focus on positive visions for the future. This helps overcome fear and resistance, such as those seen in backward populism.
Science can help bridge the gender divide in medicine through transparent research. There is however still the problem of funding inequality.
Wie Design Thinking … Mehr in die Gesellschaft gehen. #Elfenbeinturm Argumente schwächen. Stärker in die Kommunikation gehen.
We need a future in which people know the value of knowledge and that pursuing knowledge is worthwhile even if not directly applicable to the current state of things.
Science can help by investigating populist movements, conspiracy theories and divides in society.
Science can help bridge divides by making scientific findings, theories and knowledge, as a whole, more accessible and, thus, combating societal divides rooted in misinformation or unknowing.
Many scientists need to understand that their standing in society has changed - from highly respected and believed in to being questioned. This needs to be acknowledged, addressed and worked on
Science can address these challenges by promoting evidence-based policymaking and fostering international collaboration to tackle global issues like climate change. By countering misinformation and providing innovative solutions, it can help bridge divides and drive sustainable progress.
A wide acknowledgments that science (in the narrow meaning, not “scientia”) is not able to provide objective facts, that there are always normative choices in the production of knowledge and unclaryfiable uncertainties. Embrace other ways of making sense of our world, including traditional wisdom.
By learning more about the world And us around it the more we can find empathy with our existence.
Open science can trigger a rise of different perspectives. This exchange in such a condensed and focused environment may spark great creative input, and more congruent self realization through these kinds of relationships.
Through more awareness
I think that scientific efforts can help us to minimise damages & conserve our beautiful nature. These efforts also include public educational events & effective science communication stressing the impact of our behaviours not only for our individual lives but also for other future or current beings
If we could unite, we could grow together and establish great things. Unfortunately greed and power hungry people won’t give up their comfort and riches.
Working together
Science is of utmost importance when it comes to solving big challenges of our future (such as aging population, fighting disecases, o ver population etc.) With the help of AI scientific proceses will become faster.
We should have more collaboration in academia, especially interdisciplinarity and more science communication to involve more people. The academic system needs more support and resources to do this
An AI, which fact-checks information on the internet based on available research and gives a direct link to the research around the facts, so that fact-checking is as easily accessible and comprehensible as possible.
Introduce a mandatory science literacy curriculum in schools that emphasizes critical thinking, media literacy, and understanding scientific consensus.
Organize local science festivals with hands-on activities that directly connect science to daily life, making complex topics relatable and engaging.
Develop VR experiences that let people 'step into' scientific environments (e.g., labs or climate zones) to learn about complex issues interactively.
Implement policies requiring scientific assessments for every major government decision, ensuring that public policy aligns with current scientific knowledge.
Accept that perfect understanding (the world, eachother, oneself) is not a state we can reach. But keeping on building bridges is worth the constant effort.
Science is not religion. Be transparent about uncertainties, doubts and what you don’t know. Offer insights, don’t make it look like you offer something like the truth.
Unpacking fake news
Science will contribute to a better future, but I am slightly pessimistic about our common future
Science is great and is trying its best to make our world a better place for everyone. BUT the people don’t listen and follow scientific facts.
Question is: how do we change that. Trust in science. Follow the scientists opinion.
We face a lot of global challenges like climate crises, geopolitical conflict and growing inequality. However, I believe in the resilience and adaptability of human beings to address these challenges and shape a better future. Science plays a massive part in this and helps us think of solutions.
I am hopeful that science will contribute significantly
Make people understand why other people might behave different to what they are expecting
By bringing clarity
By helping us understand each other (social sciences)
It can give evidence based facts wich create a commen ground for further discussion. Without this base any discussion is futile.
Science can reduce differences if there is interaction between researchers. For this to happen, we, from less developed countries, need help from countries at the forefront of research because our governments do not usually prioritize science. Interaction is the solution!
Science bridges divides by addressing global challenges, promoting evidence-based dialogues, and fostering international collaboration. Science's objective nature helps build common ground and drive collective solutions.
Science seems to have become an essential correlating function to politics, one which then creates the temptation to proclaim the only remedying, or redemptiom, of science to be undoing this pairing. Sciences redemption can protrude politics, beginning with Nations who prioritize it over all Ideals.
Science can help bridge divides by integrating different complexity thinking/diversity.
Science can help bridge divides by integrating science based-evidence and scientists in political discussions
at the moment i cannot see how. And my view is rattert pessimistisch We have a facts and posdibilities to fact check, but some people still believe in dreagons
A recent experiment showed AI mediation doing better than human mediators in identifying common ground between different positions. That’s something worth building on.
The future I wish for is much different from the Future which seems to emerge Right now. I am afraid of a future of Ego driven individuals who are just looking for their own profits and and focus division instead of togetherness and companionship.
Science can help with bridging the increasing ideological gender gap.
I think that one of the most important things science can do for society is teaching its methodology, which is not necessarily the one that professional scientists embody in reality. science is about humility and changing your mind when presented with evidence, and this should be thaught in schools
Brings us closer but also creates a threat of power and superiority
Create more transparency for everyone.
Scientific findings on how to bridge cultural differences are being applied by schools, universities etc.
By interdisciplinary collaboration and global knowledge sharing and connection.
The value of science as a uniting force for our society is being taught with more rigor.
Develop AI-driven personalized science outreach that tailors information to individuals based on their interests and backgrounds, aiming to increase relatability and trust.
Use social media to promote citizen science projects, where people can actively participate in data collection and analysis for ongoing research topics, like biodiversity or health studies.
Create open-access data platforms where scientists and the public collaborate on local issues, such as pollution or resource management, using shared data and tools.
Train a diverse group of Science Communication Ambassadors to visit schools, workplaces, and community centers to engage people on scientific topics in an accessible way.
Develop a recurring, televised forum where scientists and policymakers discuss pressing issues in real-time, providing citizens with transparent insights into how science informs government decisions.
Truly take the time to search for and try out (mental) models that are as simple as possible and as complex as necessary.
Create a series of solutions that will allow AI to tailor results and information responses specifically to your needs while maintaining long-term context and being able to cross-reference similar findings from others.
A lot of divides exist because of prejudice and not really knowing much about a topic and perhaps feeling anxiety about the unknown and therefore rejecting the unknown. Science can combat all of that. It can deliver facts that will help people get rid of prejudice or prevent it in the first place.
I think science at least will make it “less bad”. they could make it better if politics would orientate their actions on what scientific results show.
Science brings more rationality and clarity which will help overcome extreme ideologies
Gute Zukunft durch die Wissenschaft.
I am environmental scientist and I trust science that can find common grounds and elevate society if there are science engagement and communication methods used
I imagine that scientists collaborate with local communities before initiating research projects and that local communities are involved during the process of research. Scientists and researchers can then work with the government to create policies that work towards a sustainable future
Science can be a tool in analysing how inequality effects people and which ideas for solution are the most productive.
Lot of hopes for a technologically advanced future. People have better understanding and belief in Science when it's made available for them to put it into use.
Fear of unknown is normal. Being a research student I feel a better communication of science that attracts a common minds is Essential
Ask social scientist.
Through knowledge
Scientists need to transfer to work in politics after being a scientist.
AGI will positively & radically transform society
If not held back, it can help overbridge disadvantages made by history (e.g. natural resources or history of colonalisation)
I'm not sure it can. The elections in the USA were a real blow. It seems that people don't care about science as much as they care about their own comfort and power. The only option would be for politicians to step up and act in the common interest, not in the interest of the few.
Open science is crucial to drive innovation in a collaborative manner to actually foster novel discoveries for instance to find a cure for cancer!
Research, learning and sharing in compassionate informed ways can empower and bring people together
Science can help bridge divides by interdisciplinary collaboration
If done in the right way, it can make the world more equal!
I particularly think the Culture and Science part of the Berlin Science Week was a fabulous event. It brought all the current debates into the public realm by featuring creativity and it reinforced the need for the arts and the sciences to collaborate more in the future on communication.
Sharing open and transparent data/evidence to build trust.
We need a future in which science is believed in. For this, we need good science communication.
Science has already discovered the solutions to most of the great challenges facing humanity today. What is required is more democratic buy-in for their implementation.
Science can help to bridge divides by inviting the public to take part in scientific experiments or helping them to unterstand scientific outcomes.
Fund research initiatives that prioritize voices from underrepresented communities, allowing broader perspectives in scientific discourse.
Establish digital platforms where scientists, policy-makers, and citizens engage in structured debates on controversial scientific issues, using verified data and moderated exchanges.
Das Wesen der "Kluft" muss zunächst analysiert werden, um wirkungsvoll Handeln zu können. Ist das schon geschehen? Wo ist die Analyse der "Kluft"?
Science bridges divides by fostering global collaboration on shared challenges like climate change and health. By focusing on evidence, it encourages mutual understanding, reduces polarization, and unites people across cultures to solve problems that affect everyone, creating a more inclusive future
Earth’s and mankind’s regeneration, as faces of the same coin, should be addressed simultaneously, for their mutual support and contemplate a set of values, norms and policies that prioritizes human well-being, natural and built environments, the aesthetic, ethical and cultural meaning of life.
Countering misinformation: Scientists can correct false beliefs and foster constructive discussions, especially in fields such as health, environmental issues, and technologies.
Never stop learning. Keeping an open mind.
Science can help to get more transparency about in discussions to identify fake news in a speach, discussion or video.
Research on the topic of polarisation may help us to overcome divides
Make social sciences and scientists are their knowledge more visible.
If science/scientists/scientific institutions developed more of an service mindset for decision making, it could become the source of information closest to "truth" in a post-truth era of information.
We need to work interdisciplinary. We cannot have the STEM fields without the humanities.
Mehr Transparenz & Storytelling schaffen: Wie arbeitet die Wissenschaft? Ich glaube für viele Menschen ist das Vorgehen, die Art der Forschung und Erkenntnisgewinnung nicht ganz klar. Das alles auch wieder widerlegt werden kann, dass man ein Quellen und beweise benötigt.
Always try to include a hopeful message in science engagement as hope inspires action and action inspires hope.
Science will find new ways to foster connections with society, e.g. through intersections with different disciplines.
Academic institutions offer trainings for effective science communication and participating in at least a basic level course is mandatory for all scientists.
Science can foster unity and peace by dispelling fear and misunderstanding through knowledge and effective communication.
Research, analyse and display the needs and goals of diverse groups in an emotional context to proof that the goals are the same just the approach might be different. Show the similarities by (ai driven) studies instead of the differences in human thinking.
Science can provide a better understanding of current social, economic and political issues. However, it needs to be communicated very well.
the space for misinformation shrinks
Science can help to not work only with gut feelings, but distingiush feelings from facts
accessible science communication for diverse groups outside of academia
through communication and networking activities
Fact checking both sides of a dispute to find common ground based on data
Science allows us to communicate clearer
Science communication is being done per default and with great effort by universities, academic institutions and individual scientists.
Science can build trust for the future by showing us a way to build positive scenarios
Common problems bring people together from all over the world
helps to make data based decisions
Do you want to take a look at the current results of the survey?
View survey results and scenarios
4
They are updated in real time as soon as new opinions are published and evaluated
Get an overview of the results by reading the AI-generated summaries. For more details, examine the individual opinions and their ratings on the Futures Canvas.
Develop AI-driven personalized science outreach that tailors information to individuals based on their interests and backgrounds, aiming to increase relatability and trust.
Use social media to promote citizen science projects, where people can actively participate in data collection and analysis for ongoing research topics, like biodiversity or health studies.
Introduce a mandatory science literacy curriculum in schools that emphasizes critical thinking, media literacy, and understanding scientific consensus.
Organize local science festivals with hands-on activities that directly connect science to daily life, making complex topics relatable and engaging.
Fund research initiatives that prioritize voices from underrepresented communities, allowing broader perspectives in scientific discourse.
Establish digital platforms where scientists, policy-makers, and citizens engage in structured debates on controversial scientific issues, using verified data and moderated exchanges.
Develop VR experiences that let people 'step into' scientific environments (e.g., labs or climate zones) to learn about complex issues interactively.
Implement policies requiring scientific assessments for every major government decision, ensuring that public policy aligns with current scientific knowledge.
Create open-access data platforms where scientists and the public collaborate on local issues, such as pollution or resource management, using shared data and tools.
Train a diverse group of Science Communication Ambassadors to visit schools, workplaces, and community centers to engage people on scientific topics in an accessible way.
Develop a recurring, televised forum where scientists and policymakers discuss pressing issues in real-time, providing citizens with transparent insights into how science informs government decisions.
Accept that perfect understanding (the world, eachother, oneself) is not a state we can reach. But keeping on building bridges is worth the constant effort.
Truly take the time to search for and try out (mental) models that are as simple as possible and as complex as necessary.
Science is not religion. Be transparent about uncertainties, doubts and what you don’t know. Offer insights, don’t make it look like you offer something like the truth.
Create a series of solutions that will allow AI to tailor results and information responses specifically to your needs while maintaining long-term context and being able to cross-reference similar findings from others.
Das Wesen der "Kluft" muss zunächst analysiert werden, um wirkungsvoll Handeln zu können. Ist das schon geschehen? Wo ist die Analyse der "Kluft"?
A lot of divides exist because of prejudice and not really knowing much about a topic and perhaps feeling anxiety about the unknown and therefore rejecting the unknown. Science can combat all of that. It can deliver facts that will help people get rid of prejudice or prevent it in the first place.
Unpacking fake news
I think science at least will make it “less bad”. they could make it better if politics would orientate their actions on what scientific results show.
Science brings more rationality and clarity which will help overcome extreme ideologies
Gute Zukunft durch die Wissenschaft.
Science will contribute to a better future, but I am slightly pessimistic about our common future
Science is great and is trying its best to make our world a better place for everyone. BUT the people don’t listen and follow scientific facts.
Question is: how do we change that. Trust in science. Follow the scientists opinion.
I am environmental scientist and I trust science that can find common grounds and elevate society if there are science engagement and communication methods used
We face a lot of global challenges like climate crises, geopolitical conflict and growing inequality. However, I believe in the resilience and adaptability of human beings to address these challenges and shape a better future. Science plays a massive part in this and helps us think of solutions.
I imagine that scientists collaborate with local communities before initiating research projects and that local communities are involved during the process of research. Scientists and researchers can then work with the government to create policies that work towards a sustainable future
I am hopeful that science will contribute significantly
Science can be a tool in analysing how inequality effects people and which ideas for solution are the most productive.
Never stop learning. Keeping an open mind.
Make people understand why other people might behave different to what they are expecting
Make social sciences and scientists are their knowledge more visible.
Lot of hopes for a technologically advanced future. People have better understanding and belief in Science when it's made available for them to put it into use.
Fear of unknown is normal. Being a research student I feel a better communication of science that attracts a common minds is Essential
Through knowledge
AGI will positively & radically transform society
Scientists need to transfer to work in politics after being a scientist.
Ask social scientist.
By bringing clarity
By helping us understand each other (social sciences)
It can give evidence based facts wich create a commen ground for further discussion. Without this base any discussion is futile.
If not held back, it can help overbridge disadvantages made by history (e.g. natural resources or history of colonalisation)
Science can reduce differences if there is interaction between researchers. For this to happen, we, from less developed countries, need help from countries at the forefront of research because our governments do not usually prioritize science. Interaction is the solution!
Science bridges divides by addressing global challenges, promoting evidence-based dialogues, and fostering international collaboration. Science's objective nature helps build common ground and drive collective solutions.
Science can help to get more transparency about in discussions to identify fake news in a speach, discussion or video.
I'm not sure it can. The elections in the USA were a real blow. It seems that people don't care about science as much as they care about their own comfort and power. The only option would be for politicians to step up and act in the common interest, not in the interest of the few.
Open science is crucial to drive innovation in a collaborative manner to actually foster novel discoveries for instance to find a cure for cancer!
Research, learning and sharing in compassionate informed ways can empower and bring people together
Science seems to have become an essential correlating function to politics, one which then creates the temptation to proclaim the only remedying, or redemptiom, of science to be undoing this pairing. Sciences redemption can protrude politics, beginning with Nations who prioritize it over all Ideals.
Science can help bridge divides by interdisciplinary collaboration
Science can help bridge divides by integrating different complexity thinking/diversity.
Science can help bridge divides by integrating science based-evidence and scientists in political discussions
The future I wish for is much different from the Future which seems to emerge Right now. I am afraid of a future of Ego driven individuals who are just looking for their own profits and and focus division instead of togetherness and companionship.
A recent experiment showed AI mediation doing better than human mediators in identifying common ground between different positions. That’s something worth building on.
Science can help with bridging the increasing ideological gender gap.
If done in the right way, it can make the world more equal!
By learning more about the world And us around it the more we can find empathy with our existence.
I think that one of the most important things science can do for society is teaching its methodology, which is not necessarily the one that professional scientists embody in reality. science is about humility and changing your mind when presented with evidence, and this should be thaught in schools
at the moment i cannot see how. And my view is rattert pessimistisch We have a facts and posdibilities to fact check, but some people still believe in dreagons
A wide acknowledgments that science (in the narrow meaning, not “scientia”) is not able to provide objective facts, that there are always normative choices in the production of knowledge and unclaryfiable uncertainties. Embrace other ways of making sense of our world, including traditional wisdom.
Open science can trigger a rise of different perspectives. This exchange in such a condensed and focused environment may spark great creative input, and more congruent self realization through these kinds of relationships.
Through more awareness
I think that scientific efforts can help us to minimise damages & conserve our beautiful nature. These efforts also include public educational events & effective science communication stressing the impact of our behaviours not only for our individual lives but also for other future or current beings
Working together
Brings us closer but also creates a threat of power and superiority
If we could unite, we could grow together and establish great things. Unfortunately greed and power hungry people won’t give up their comfort and riches.
Science is of utmost importance when it comes to solving big challenges of our future (such as aging population, fighting disecases, o ver population etc.) With the help of AI scientific proceses will become faster.
Create more transparency for everyone.
We should have more collaboration in academia, especially interdisciplinarity and more science communication to involve more people. The academic system needs more support and resources to do this
Always try to include a hopeful message in science engagement as hope inspires action and action inspires hope.
I particularly think the Culture and Science part of the Berlin Science Week was a fabulous event. It brought all the current debates into the public realm by featuring creativity and it reinforced the need for the arts and the sciences to collaborate more in the future on communication.
Earth’s and mankind’s regeneration, as faces of the same coin, should be addressed simultaneously, for their mutual support and contemplate a set of values, norms and policies that prioritizes human well-being, natural and built environments, the aesthetic, ethical and cultural meaning of life.
Science can help to not work only with gut feelings, but distingiush feelings from facts
accessible science communication for diverse groups outside of academia
Science allows us to communicate clearer
helps to make data based decisions
Common problems bring people together from all over the world
Science communication is being done per default and with great effort by universities, academic institutions and individual scientists.
Fact checking both sides of a dispute to find common ground based on data
through communication and networking activities
Science can build trust for the future by showing us a way to build positive scenarios
Science can provide a better understanding of current social, economic and political issues. However, it needs to be communicated very well.
the space for misinformation shrinks
Research, analyse and display the needs and goals of diverse groups in an emotional context to proof that the goals are the same just the approach might be different. Show the similarities by (ai driven) studies instead of the differences in human thinking.
Science can foster unity and peace by dispelling fear and misunderstanding through knowledge and effective communication.
Science will find new ways to foster connections with society, e.g. through intersections with different disciplines.
Academic institutions offer trainings for effective science communication and participating in at least a basic level course is mandatory for all scientists.
Mehr Transparenz & Storytelling schaffen: Wie arbeitet die Wissenschaft? Ich glaube für viele Menschen ist das Vorgehen, die Art der Forschung und Erkenntnisgewinnung nicht ganz klar. Das alles auch wieder widerlegt werden kann, dass man ein Quellen und beweise benötigt.
If science/scientists/scientific institutions developed more of an service mindset for decision making, it could become the source of information closest to "truth" in a post-truth era of information.
We need to work interdisciplinary. We cannot have the STEM fields without the humanities.
Countering misinformation: Scientists can correct false beliefs and foster constructive discussions, especially in fields such as health, environmental issues, and technologies.
Research on the topic of polarisation may help us to overcome divides
Science bridges divides by fostering global collaboration on shared challenges like climate change and health. By focusing on evidence, it encourages mutual understanding, reduces polarization, and unites people across cultures to solve problems that affect everyone, creating a more inclusive future
Sharing open and transparent data/evidence to build trust.
We need a future in which science is believed in. For this, we need good science communication.
Scientific findings on how to bridge cultural differences are being applied by schools, universities etc.
Science has already discovered the solutions to most of the great challenges facing humanity today. What is required is more democratic buy-in for their implementation.
Science can help to bridge divides by inviting the public to take part in scientific experiments or helping them to unterstand scientific outcomes.
Science is about exploring possible futures and finding solutions to problems caused by inflexibility and looking backward. It provides fact-based hope and encourages people to focus on positive visions for the future. This helps overcome fear and resistance, such as those seen in backward populism.
An AI, which fact-checks information on the internet based on available research and gives a direct link to the research around the facts, so that fact-checking is as easily accessible and comprehensible as possible.
By interdisciplinary collaboration and global knowledge sharing and connection.
Science can help bridge the gender divide in medicine through transparent research. There is however still the problem of funding inequality.
The value of science as a uniting force for our society is being taught with more rigor.
Wie Design Thinking … Mehr in die Gesellschaft gehen. #Elfenbeinturm Argumente schwächen. Stärker in die Kommunikation gehen.
We need a future in which people know the value of knowledge and that pursuing knowledge is worthwhile even if not directly applicable to the current state of things.
Science can help by investigating populist movements, conspiracy theories and divides in society.
Science can help bridge divides by making scientific findings, theories and knowledge, as a whole, more accessible and, thus, combating societal divides rooted in misinformation or unknowing.
Many scientists need to understand that their standing in society has changed - from highly respected and believed in to being questioned. This needs to be acknowledged, addressed and worked on
Science can address these challenges by promoting evidence-based policymaking and fostering international collaboration to tackle global issues like climate change. By countering misinformation and providing innovative solutions, it can help bridge divides and drive sustainable progress.
feasible
not feasible
transformative
limited impact
Strategic Solutions
Visionary Goals
Aspirational Concepts
Practical Steps
107 Opinions
563 Ratings
563 Ratings
Resulting future scenarios
Based on their ratings, submitted opinions have been compiled into four distinct future scenarios, autonomously generated by artificial intelligence.
Strategic Solutions
AI Revolutionizes Inclusive Science Outreach
Practical Steps
Science Fests Transform Community Engagement
Visionary Goals
Science and AI: Foundations for Unity
Aspirational Concepts
Science-Driven Policies Shape Future Governance
AI Revolutionizes Inclusive Science Outreach
Based on 71 opinions and 452 ratings.
View individual opinions in the Futures Canvas by filtering for the sector "Strategic Solutions".
- AI could personalize science outreach, fostering inclusivity and active public involvement in science issues.
- Comprehensive curriculums might focus on critical thinking, amplifying diverse voices and enhancing scientific diversity.
- Virtual reality and AI could offer interactive learning and transparent discussions on complex issues.
In a future where artificial intelligence could personalize science outreach, engagement might become more inclusive and relatable. Tailoring information to individual interests might foster trust and understanding, while social media might empower citizens to actively participate in science, driving public involvement in pressing issues like climate change or health studies.
As comprehensive science literacy curriculums could become mandatory in schools, they might prioritize critical thinking and media literacy, ensuring future generations are better equipped to navigate information landscapes. Efforts to amplify underrepresented voices in research and establish respected platforms for public discourse could lead to a more diverse and inclusive scientific community.
Immersive experiences might be crafted using virtual reality to bring complex scientific concepts to the public, enabling interactive learning beyond traditional settings. Meanwhile, AI could revolutionize data processing, enabling streamlined, relevant information distribution, which could support transparent discussions around contentious issues.
Localized scientific initiatives might see researchers collaborating closely with communities, integrating local knowledge into policy-making processes. As understanding science’s situational relevance becomes commonplace, bridging divides through interdisciplinary collaboration could become routine. Science might then transcend cultural and societal barriers, creating commonality and fostering socio-political resilience through knowledge and collective progress.
Science Fests Transform Community Engagement
Based on 16 opinions and 45 ratings.
View individual opinions in the Futures Canvas by filtering for the sector "Practical Steps".
- Science festivals and ambassadors bridge complex topics with daily life, enhancing community understanding.
- Science forums and open dialogue can challenge ideologies, promoting evidence-based discussions.
- Integrating culture and science, like Berlin Science Week, highlights arts-sciences collaborations.
In a future where science becomes more intricately woven into the fabric of daily life, local science festivals might flourish, offering hands-on activities that bridge complex topics with everyday experiences. Communities could experience a transformation through Science Communication Ambassadors, who engage people in accessible dialogues, casting light on scientific intricacies without claiming ultimate truths. In this envisioned society, televised forums where scientists and policymakers discuss current challenges might become regular features, providing transparent and real-time insights into how science shapes policy decisions.
The potential for science to catalyze rationality and clarity might help to dispel extreme ideologies, offering evidence-based facts as a common ground for discussions that otherwise risk futility. Although optimism for the future remains tinged with skepticism, engaging communities in science with hopeful narratives might inspire actions towards a more harmonious world. Open science might trigger the rise of varied perspectives, fostering creativity and self-realization through collaborative exchanges.
Notably, events like Berlin Science Week could set a precedent for integrating culture and science, emphasizing the arts-sciences collaboration's importance in the communication domain. Science might also bridge gender gaps in fields like medicine, despite persisting funding equity challenges, thus reinforcing its role as a unifying societal force.
Science and AI: Foundations for Unity
Based on 9 opinions and 23 ratings.
View individual opinions in the Futures Canvas by filtering for the sector "Visionary Goals".
- Science could bridge historical disadvantages, overcoming biases and fostering inclusive progress with political support.
- AI might excel in conflict resolution, helping societies unite and surpass greed-driven barriers.
- Education could prioritize knowledge's intrinsic value, fostering innovation and adaptation for shared prosperity.
In a future scenario where science might pave the way for a brighter future, it could serve as a catalyst for bridging historical disadvantages, such as those stemming from natural resource disparities or colonial legacies. By fostering understanding of diverse behaviors through scientific clarity, communities might overcome longstanding biases and work collaboratively towards inclusive progress. Despite potential resistance from those prioritizing personal comfort and power, the role of science in fostering equitable growth could be significant if supported by collective political will and action aimed at the common good.
The advancement in artificial intelligence might also play a pivotal role, particularly in mediation and conflict resolution. Hypothetically, AI could surpass traditional human mediators in identifying shared interests, building on recent experimental successes. This technological growth might become instrumental in unifying divergent groups, allowing societies to transcend greed-driven barriers and pursue collective achievements. Achieving transparency and acknowledging the intrinsic value of knowledge could become essential in this evolving landscape.
Education systems might pivot towards instilling an appreciation for knowledge, emphasizing its worth beyond immediate applicability. In such a future, the pursuit of knowledge could become a prioritized societal value, encouraging innovation and adaptation, ultimately steering human civilization toward new horizons of shared prosperity.
Science-Driven Policies Shape Future Governance
Based on 10 opinions and 25 ratings.
View individual opinions in the Futures Canvas by filtering for the sector "Aspirational Concepts".
- Government policies may require scientific assessments, boosting transparency and collaborative problem-solving with open-access data.
- Scientists' roles in politics might expand, promoting open-mindedness and bridging ideological gaps through education.
- Recognizing science's limitations, integrating insights with traditional wisdom could balance collaboration with potential power dynamics.
In a future scenario, government policies could undergo a significant transformation by mandating scientific assessments for every major decision, potentially aligning public strategies more closely with current scientific understandings. This approach might inspire transparency and collaborative problem-solving through open-access data platforms, enabling scientists and citizens to jointly address local issues like pollution. This synergy could enhance community-driven governance and ensure informed decision-making processes.
The role of scientists in politics might expand, as their methodical and evidence-focused perspectives could contribute to bridging ideological and gender gaps. This transition might be grounded in teaching scientific methodology as a foundational societal skill, emphasizing humility and adaptability to new evidence. By doing so, educational systems could instill a culture of open-mindedness and adaptability in future generations.
However, there might be recognition of the limitations of science in delivering absolute facts, acknowledging the intrinsic normative choices and uncertainties in knowledge production. This outlook could foster an appreciation for diverse worldviews, integrating scientific insight with traditional wisdom to shape our understanding. Yet, increasing awareness could simultaneously bring societies closer while introducing potential threats of power dynamics, emphasizing the delicate balance between collaboration and control in a science-driven world.
Thank you for your participation.